39 Days To Alien War: December 3rd

SUMMARY

Host Patrick Scott Armstrong discusses Clif High's prediction of an impending alien war on December 3rd, based on his Web-Bot data analysis. The discussion highlights skepticism and the unverifiable nature of High's past predictions.

MAIN POINTS

• Clif High predicts an alien invasion on December 3rd, triggered by a Joe Rogan and Donald Trump interview. [0:37]
• High's Web-Bot program, developed in 1997, allegedly predicts future events, though its accuracy is questioned. [1:38]
• Critics argue that High's predictions lack evidence and are retrofitted to align with real events. [3:04]
• High claims past data indicated a significant event linked to a media figure, later associated with Joe Rogan. [5:23]
• High's data suggests a link between a predicted event and a financial crisis, sparking further skepticism. [9:08]
• Previous claims of High predicting events like 9/11 are unsubstantiated by concrete evidence. [13:44]

DETAILED ANALYSIS

In a recent discussion, Patrick Scott Armstrong delves into the bold prediction made by Clif High about an upcoming alien war. High, known for developing the Web-Bot program in 1997, claims this tool can predict future events by analyzing data from the internet. His latest forecast suggests a massive alien conflict will occur on December 3rd, supposedly triggered by a temporal marker involving a Joe Rogan interview with Donald Trump.

However, Armstrong points out the lack of evidence supporting High's past predictions, noting that many of his claims appear to be retrofitted to match actual events.

The narrative begins with High's early development of the Web-Bot, initially aimed at predicting stock market trends. In a shift of focus, High claims the software eventually started predicting significant global events. However, Armstrong underscores the absence of verifiable evidence for these predictions, including major occurrences like the 9/11 attacks and the Indonesian tsunami.

Further complicating the matter is High's reliance on vague and general statements that critics argue can be manipulated to fit a wide range of outcomes. Armstrong also highlights an instance where High mentions a connection between his data and a pivotal media figure, initially not recognized as Joe Rogan, which later became part of the prediction narrative.

Despite the skepticism surrounding High's claims, his ideas continue to intrigue a segment of the online community. Armstrong questions the motivations behind the continued attention, suggesting it may stem from the human tendency to seek patterns and meaning in randomness. As December 3rd approaches, Armstrong speculates on how High and his followers might respond if the predicted event fails to materialize, considering past instances where unfulfilled predictions were simply deferred or reinterpreted.

Ultimately, the discussion raises broader questions about the nature of predictions and the allure of conspiracy theories in the digital age.

LINKS

• Vetted Clips Channel
• Vetted Spanish Channel
• Vetted German Channel
• Vetted Patreon
• Vetted Discord
• Vetted Twitter
• Vetted Website

KEYWORDS