The Biggest IPO In History Isn’t What You Think It Is

SUMMARY

Ed Elson hosts a discussion with Patrick Boyle on the controversial details surrounding SpaceX’s anticipated IPO, highlighting concerns over valuation and index inclusion. Sid Jain analyzes the recent outperformance of emerging markets, while Ed breaks down the implications of the revised partnership between Microsoft and OpenAI.

MAIN POINTS

• Patrick Boyle raises concerns about SpaceX's IPO, particularly its rapid inclusion in the NASDAQ 100 and the high valuation multiples being discussed. [2:00]
• The conversation focuses on the unprecedented price-to-sales ratio for SpaceX and the challenges of justifying such a valuation compared to historical IPOs like Google. [5:01]
• Discussion centers on NASDAQ's rule changes to fast-track SpaceX into the index, raising ethical questions and highlighting the influence of Elon Musk's negotiations. [9:02]
• Skepticism is expressed about the feasibility of space-based data centers and the sustainability of Starlink's growth projections within SpaceX's business model. [14:00]
• Sid Jain explains that emerging markets' recent surge is driven largely by AI-related semiconductor companies in Taiwan and South Korea, rather than broad-based economic growth. [18:02]
• The discussion addresses how geopolitical tensions, particularly in Iran, and high oil prices are being overshadowed by AI optimism in both developed and emerging markets. [25:02]
• Ed Elson details the renegotiated relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI, noting the end of exclusivity and the new terms that benefit both companies. [29:00]

DETAILED ANALYSIS

The episode opens with a satirical commentary on current events before shifting focus to major market developments. The central topic is the upcoming SpaceX IPO, which is positioned to be the largest in history with a targeted valuation of $2 trillion. This figure would place SpaceX among the top five most valuable U.S. companies, yet the path to this valuation is fraught with controversy.

Patrick Boyle, a finance professor and hedge fund manager, outlines his skepticism, emphasizing the extraordinary price-to-sales ratio of 125, a figure far exceeding historical precedents for public offerings. For context, Google went public at 10 times sales while experiencing much higher growth rates, and even then, such a multiple was considered aggressive. Boyle argues that while SpaceX is an innovative and growing company, the valuation being sought is disconnected from traditional financial metrics, especially given the lack of transparency around actual earnings.

A significant concern is the process by which SpaceX is being fast-tracked into the NASDAQ 100 index. Normally, companies must meet stringent requirements and remain public for at least a year before index inclusion. However, due to negotiations led by Elon Musk, NASDAQ reportedly altered its rules, allowing SpaceX to be included just 15 days after its IPO.

This move is expected to create immense buying pressure, as index funds and portfolio managers tracking the NASDAQ 100 will be compelled to purchase shares regardless of valuation. Boyle points out that this mechanism effectively transfers risk to passive investors, many of whom may not fully understand the underlying business or its risks. The ethical implications of such rule changes are debated, with parallels drawn to previous controversial inclusions like MicroStrategy, which exposed index investors to concentrated risks.

The conversation also delves into the business fundamentals of SpaceX. While the company is a leader in space launches and satellite internet through Starlink, much of the anticipated growth is speculative. Boyle highlights the technical and economic challenges of proposed space-based data centers, noting that cooling requirements in the vacuum of space make large-scale operations impractical with current technology.

Starlink, which currently accounts for a significant portion of SpaceX’s profits, faces limits to its addressable market, as the high cost of service restricts potential customer growth, particularly in lower-income regions. Furthermore, a large share of SpaceX’s launch activity is dedicated to deploying its own satellites, raising questions about the true size of the external market for commercial launches.

Following a brief intermission, the focus shifts to emerging markets, where Sid Jain provides insight into the recent rally. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has outperformed the S&P 500, driven primarily by semiconductor companies in Taiwan and South Korea, such as TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix. These three firms alone account for approximately 70% of the index’s earnings growth, underscoring the extent to which AI-related capital expenditure is shaping global equity performance.

Jain notes that while there are positive developments in other regions, including South America and India, the index’s performance is heavily skewed by a handful of large technology companies. Structural improvements in emerging market economies are acknowledged, with several countries experiencing stronger earnings growth and political shifts toward more business-friendly environments.

The discussion addresses the impact of geopolitical tensions, particularly the situation in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, on emerging markets. Despite high oil prices and supply chain concerns, investor sentiment remains buoyant, largely due to the perceived structural growth opportunity in AI. Jain cautions that this optimism may be masking underlying risks, especially if energy shocks begin to affect broader economic activity.

He also emphasizes that the current rally is less about investors abandoning U.S. equities and more about rebalancing portfolios to capture growth opportunities abroad at relatively lower valuations.

The episode concludes with a breakdown of the renegotiated partnership between Microsoft and OpenAI. The new agreement ends Microsoft’s exclusivity as OpenAI’s cloud provider, allowing OpenAI to distribute its products through other platforms such as Amazon Web Services. While this initially caused a dip in Microsoft’s stock price, the market later recognized the benefits for both parties.

Microsoft will no longer pay a revenue share to OpenAI for cloud sales, retains significant ownership and access to OpenAI’s technology, and secures a fixed timeline for these privileges until 2032. The arrangement is characterized as a balanced outcome, with neither side achieving a decisive advantage. Microsoft’s valuation remains attractive relative to other major technology firms, and the company’s prospects will become clearer with upcoming earnings reports.

LINKS

• Prof G Markets Tour tickets and dates.
• Prof G Markets YouTube channel.
• Prof G Markets newsletter subscription.
• Order 'Notes On Being A Man' book.
• Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice.
• Prof G Markets Instagram.
• Scott Galloway's Instagram.
• Ed Elson's Instagram.
• Ed Elson's X (Twitter) profile.
• Ed Elson's Substack newsletter.

KEYWORDS