Bonds Are Going Haywire Again — Howard Marks Explains Why

SUMMARY

Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree Capital Management, discusses the structural issues driving recent turmoil in the U.S. bond market and the implications of persistent fiscal deficits. Daniel Baer provides insights on U.S.-Iran relations at the UN General Assembly, while Ed Elson critiques SB Energy's delayed IPO and questionable business fundamentals.

MAIN POINTS

• U.S. Treasury yields reach multi-decade highs despite government buyback efforts, signaling investor concerns. [1:30]
• Howard Marks attributes rising yields to persistent inflation, large fiscal deficits, and intense demand for capital. [6:00]
• Marks argues that current interest rates are low by historical standards and recent low rates were the true anomaly. [11:01]
• Psychological shifts among investors and the symbolic $40 trillion national debt mark drive renewed focus on fiscal risks. [17:00]
• Daniel Baer discusses mixed signals in U.S.-Iran diplomacy and the impact of the conflict on global energy prices. [22:01]
• Baer highlights the dual threat of energy and food price shocks due to ongoing conflicts in Iran and Ukraine. [26:02]
• SB Energy delays its IPO amid skepticism over its business model, lack of operational data centers, and questionable revenue projections. [29:00]

DETAILED ANALYSIS

Recent movements in the U.S. bond market have drawn significant attention as Treasury yields surged to levels not seen in decades. The 10-year Treasury yield exceeded 5.1%, marking a 19-year high, while the 30-year yield approached 5.4%, a threshold last reached in 2004. Even the 5-year yield breached 5%, surpassing pre-financial crisis levels.

These developments occurred despite the Treasury's unprecedented buyback programs, which saw $6 billion in long-dated bonds purchased in an attempt to stabilize yields. However, legendary investor Howard Marks contends that these interventions are merely cosmetic and fail to address deeper structural issues within the U.S. economy.

Marks identifies three primary drivers behind the rise in yields. First, inflation remains stubbornly above the Federal Reserve's 2% target, currently hovering around 3.4% due to factors such as elevated oil prices linked to the Ukraine conflict. Investors, wary of inflation eroding the purchasing power of their returns, demand higher yields as compensation.

Second, the scale of the U.S. fiscal deficit has become increasingly concerning. The national debt recently surpassed $40 trillion, and annual deficits are approaching $2 trillion, even in times of economic prosperity and low unemployment. Marks likens this fiscal behavior to reckless overspending, suggesting that both domestic and international investors are losing confidence in the U.S. government's willingness to address its budgetary imbalance.

Third, there is intense competition for capital, with government borrowing competing against private sector needs, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence, which is drawing substantial investment.

A notable shift has occurred in investor psychology. While the U.S. has run deficits for decades, the sheer magnitude of recent deficits and the symbolic crossing of the $40 trillion debt threshold have heightened anxieties. Marks observes that there is now little political discourse about balancing the budget, a topic that once featured prominently in national debates.

The lack of immediate, visible consequences from persistent deficits has led to complacency among policymakers and the public, but the bond market's reaction suggests that patience may be wearing thin.

Despite the current alarm, Marks emphasizes that today's interest rates are not historically high. He points out that the recent era of near-zero rates, which lasted from 2009 through 2021, was an aberration rather than the norm. In his view, a 30-year bond yielding around 5.3% is low compared to most of the postwar period.

This perspective challenges the prevailing narrative that rates are unusually elevated, suggesting instead that markets may be returning to a more typical environment. Nevertheless, Marks cautions that predicting the precise trajectory of yields is inherently uncertain, as market pricing reflects a complex interplay of economic fundamentals and investor sentiment.

For investors, the implications are nuanced. While higher rates generally pose challenges for equities, Marks argues that the primary risk lies not with U.S. companies but with dollar-denominated assets more broadly. If the dollar's value erodes due to fiscal mismanagement, investors might consider diversifying internationally.

However, the U.S. remains the most robust developed economy, and shifting away from dollar assets entails its own risks. Marks ultimately advises caution, noting that there is no clear answer as to when, or even if, a fiscal reckoning will occur. He cites Warren Buffett's observation that the consequences of fiscal excess could materialize in two years or twenty, underscoring the unpredictability inherent in financial markets.

The discussion then shifts to geopolitics, with Daniel Baer analyzing the state of U.S.-Iran relations amid heightened tensions at the United Nations General Assembly. President Trump issued strong threats against Iran, while Iranian leaders remained defiant. Despite this rhetoric, diplomatic contacts continue, though both sides are leveraging the situation for domestic political advantage.

The ongoing conflict has driven Brent crude prices above $103 per barrel, a more than 40% increase since the onset of hostilities, with ripple effects on global energy and food prices. Baer warns that even if a deal is reached to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, logistical and trust issues will keep prices elevated in the medium term. He also highlights the compounded risk of food insecurity due to disrupted wheat exports from both Russia and Ukraine, which could have dire consequences for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Finally, the episode covers the delayed IPO of SB Energy, an AI data center provider. The company postponed its public offering after failing to attract sufficient investor interest at a $50 billion valuation. Scrutiny revealed that SB Energy has no operational data centers, with most projects not yet started, and its claimed revenue backlog is heavily skewed toward distant future projections.

The majority of its current revenue comes from a shrinking solar business, casting further doubt on its lofty valuation. The market's skepticism reflects a broader caution toward speculative growth stories amid rising interest rates and tighter financial conditions.

LINKS

• Prof G Markets YouTube Channel
• Prof G Markets newsletter subscription
• Order 'Notes On Being A Man'
• Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
• Prof G Markets on Instagram
• Scott Galloway on Instagram
• Ed Elson on Instagram
• Ed Elson on X (Twitter)
• Ed Elson on Substack
• Built rewards program for renters and homeowners

KEYWORDS