How Influencers Hijacked The Consumer Economy

SUMMARY

Ed Elson hosts a discussion with Rachel Karten and Allison Schrager on the growing dominance of influencers in shaping consumer behavior and business strategy. The conversation explores the mechanics of virality, the democratization of influence, and the long-term implications for brands and consumers.

MAIN POINTS

• Social media-driven trends are causing young consumers to wait in long lines for viral products like the dot cake. [2:00]
• Algorithm changes have enabled anyone, regardless of follower count, to become an influencer and drive product trends. [5:01]
• The influencer economy is seen as more democratic than past gatekeeper-driven systems, though it remains highly winner-take-all. [9:01]
• Some brands succeed by showing restraint and strategic use of social media rather than flooding platforms with influencer partnerships. [14:01]
• Viral products often succeed due to sensory hooks and the appeal of participation, but their long-term business impact is uncertain. [19:00]
• Brands are increasingly manufacturing organic-looking influencer content, blurring lines between authentic and paid promotion. [27:00]
• The influencer economy is expected to become more institutionalized, with marketing budgets shifting toward both top and micro-influencers. [30:01]

DETAILED ANALYSIS

The discussion opens with examples of how viral social media trends have directly impacted business performance, such as Chili's triple dipper and Dunkin's bucket of coffee, both of which gained traction through widespread online sharing. This phenomenon is not limited to food; over 80% of Gen Z discover new music through social media, and marketing agencies now engineer virality by simulating trends across platforms like TikTok. The panelists note that the current cultural currency is participation—brands seek to create products and experiences that encourage consumers to generate content, thereby fueling momentum and visibility.

Allison Schrager frames the influencer economy as a manifestation of modern capitalism and technological innovation, where the desire to try and share new products has replaced traditional forms of social gathering. She draws a historical parallel to the 1990s, when social elites and PR professionals acted as gatekeepers, orchestrating hype around exclusive venues. Today, the process is more democratic: anyone with internet access can become an influencer, and the barriers of wealth and location have diminished.

However, the economic structure remains highly skewed, with the top 1% of creators capturing the vast majority of views and engagement, echoing winner-take-all dynamics seen in other sectors.

Rachel Karten highlights the shift in algorithmic design, which now favors interest-based content over follower count. This change allows individuals with small audiences to reach millions, making the influencer landscape more accessible but also more unpredictable. She observes that while lining up for trendy products is not new, platforms like TikTok have amplified the urgency and created a new genre of content—'I tried the viral thing'—which perpetuates the cycle of virality.

Karten also notes that some brands are responding to this environment by exercising restraint on social media, building trust through selective engagement rather than aggressive influencer marketing.

The conversation explores whether virality is essential for business success. While social media is a powerful lever, the panelists caution against viewing it as a guaranteed path to growth. Schrager points out that viral moments can provide a strong start, but long-term success depends on the quality of the product, business fundamentals, and sustained marketing efforts.

Karten suggests that brands can benefit by treating their own social channels as hubs for community engagement, creating serialized content that builds loyalty rather than relying solely on external influencers.

The panel also addresses the psychological and social drivers behind viral trends. Sensory hooks, such as the auditory appeal of scraping a spoon across a dot cake, play a role in capturing attention. Participation offers a sense of belonging and excitement, making viral products accessible alternatives to traditional social activities like nightlife.

The trend toward sober, screen-conscious gatherings among young people may also contribute to the popularity of these in-person, shareable experiences.

Concerns arise over the increasing commercialization and professionalization of influencer content. Brands are now manufacturing organic-looking posts through shadow accounts and undisclosed partnerships, making it difficult for consumers to distinguish between genuine recommendations and paid promotions. The lack of clear disclosure, coupled with regulatory lag, risks eroding trust and confusing audiences about the authenticity of what they see online.

Looking ahead, Schrager predicts that influencer-driven marketing will become further institutionalized as consumer attention shifts away from traditional media to short-form video. Marketing budgets are likely to be reallocated, with both top-tier and micro-influencers playing key roles. Karten anticipates a diversification of influencer partnerships, with brands recognizing the value of smaller creators who can deliver scale without large followings.

Both panelists agree that while the system is imperfect and evolving, it represents a significant shift in how products are marketed and consumed, with lasting implications for businesses and consumers alike.

LINKS

• Prof G Markets YouTube Channel
• Prof G Markets newsletter subscription
• Order 'Notes On Being A Man'
• Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
• Prof G Markets Instagram
• Scott Galloway Instagram
• Ed Elson Instagram
• Ed Elson X (Twitter)
• Ed Elson Substack
• ODO business software platform
• Vanguard bond funds information
• LinkedIn Ads promotional offer

KEYWORDS