Aschenbrenner’s AI Fund Collapse Is Just The Beginning

SUMMARY

Ed Elson hosts a discussion with Michael Green and Katie Martin on the collapse of Leopold Aschenbrenner’s AI-focused hedge fund, the risks of leveraged ETFs, and the implications of U.S. intervention in currency markets. The episode also examines Trump Media’s sale of early access to social media posts and its impact on financial markets and regulation.

MAIN POINTS

• Leopold Aschenbrenner’s fund, Situational Awareness, reported extraordinary returns before suffering a rapid $35 billion loss due to excessive leverage and forced liquidation. [1:02]
• Michael Green explains how leveraged ETFs and volatility drag have amplified risks in the semiconductor sector, drawing parallels to the fund’s collapse. [5:01]
• The South Korean stock market crash, driven by leveraged ETF speculation, prompts calls for regulatory intervention and product bans. [10:03]
• U.S. assets under management in leveraged ETFs surge to record highs, raising concerns about potential systemic risks similar to those seen in South Korea. [13:00]
• The U.S. joins Japan in intervening to support the yen, marking the first such bilateral currency intervention in decades and signaling geopolitical alignment. [16:01]
• Discussion of the U.S. selling euros to support the yen highlights the complexity and novelty of recent currency interventions. [24:00]
• Trump Media launches Truth API, offering early access to his social media posts for a fee, raising ethical and regulatory questions about market influence and profiteering. [31:02]

DETAILED ANALYSIS

The episode opens with a detailed account of the collapse of Leopold Aschenbrenner’s hedge fund, Situational Awareness, which had reported a staggering 439% net return in the first half of the year before losing approximately $35 billion in assets within a week. The fund’s downfall is attributed to the use of extreme leverage—reportedly up to 400%—which created a feedback loop where small declines in asset prices forced sales to reduce leverage, further depressing prices and accelerating losses. This dynamic, known as a liquidation cascade, ultimately led to the fund’s rapid unwinding, with its remaining assets reportedly acquired by Citadel.

The discussion emphasizes that such an outcome is almost inevitable when high leverage is combined with volatile assets, especially when the fund’s size makes it a visible target for market participants.

Michael Green, Chief Strategist at Simplify Asset Management, provides context by comparing the fund’s leverage to that used in leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs), particularly in the semiconductor sector. Leveraged ETFs, which are required by their prospectuses to maintain a fixed leverage ratio, must rebalance daily. This rebalancing process introduces what is known as volatility drag: gains and losses compound asymmetrically, resulting in long-term returns that are often worse than the underlying asset’s performance, especially at high leverage levels.

Green illustrates this with mathematical examples, showing how a 10% gain followed by a 10% loss results in a net loss for leveraged positions. The effect is magnified in products offering 2x or 3x leverage, leading to significant capital erosion unless volatility is actively managed or harvested.

The conversation turns to the recent experience in South Korea, where retail investors flocked to leveraged ETFs, particularly in the technology sector. The resulting volatility led to a dramatic 44% crash in the KOSPI index from its June highs, over a million margin calls, and widespread account liquidations. Public outcry prompted regulatory action, including the banning of leveraged ETFs and repeated market closures.

Green notes that while leveraged products can be useful tools for professional investors employing volatility harvesting strategies, they pose significant risks to uninformed retail investors who may not understand the compounding effects of volatility drag. He draws a parallel to consumer protection in other industries, arguing that financial products should be subject to similar scrutiny and labeling to prevent widespread harm.

In the United States, assets under management in leveraged ETFs have reached a record $218 billion, a 60% increase since March. Green warns that the same feedback loops and systemic risks observed in South Korea could manifest in U.S. markets, especially as passive and price-insensitive investment vehicles grow in prominence. He highlights that some of the pressure on South Korean markets originated from U.S.-based ETFs, which funneled large amounts of capital into Korean equities, illustrating the global interconnectedness of financial markets and the potential for regulatory challenges to cross borders.

The episode then shifts to international currency markets, where Katie Martin of the Financial Times analyzes the recent U.S. intervention to support the Japanese yen. The yen had fallen to its weakest level in 40 years, prompting Tokyo to intervene by selling $59 billion to buy back its currency. Unusually, the U.S.

Treasury joined the intervention, marking the first such bilateral action since 2011 and signaling a strong geopolitical partnership. Martin explains that while the intervention is partly framed as a gesture of friendship, it also serves U.S. interests by discouraging Japan from selling large amounts of U.S. Treasuries, which could further destabilize the already fragile Treasury market.

The U.S. intervention, including the sale of euros to support the yen, is described as unprecedented and indicative of the complex financial arrangements underpinning global currency stability.

Martin further discusses the broader implications of such interventions, noting that the U.S.’s willingness to support allied currencies may introduce new dynamics into global macro trading. Political considerations could influence which countries receive support, potentially affecting investor behavior and market stability. The episode also highlights the symbiotic relationship between the U.S. and Japan: Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S.

Treasuries, and both countries have strong incentives to maintain currency and market stability.

Finally, the episode addresses the launch of Trump Media’s Truth API, a service offering financial firms early access to Trump’s social media posts for $100,000 per month. This move is positioned as a lucrative opportunity for high-frequency trading firms, given the market-moving potential of Trump’s statements. The segment raises concerns about the normalization of such practices, the ethical implications of monetizing privileged access to information, and the broader erosion of regulatory safeguards in U.S. markets.

The discussion concludes with a call for vigilance and public engagement in the face of increasing financial and political normalization of potentially harmful practices.

LINKS

• Prof G Markets YouTube channel
• Prof G Markets newsletter subscription
• Order 'Notes On Being A Man'
• Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
• Markets on Instagram
• Scott Galloway on Instagram
• Ed Elson on Instagram
• Ed Elson on X (Twitter)
• Ed Elson on Substack
• SoFi student loan solutions
• VCX by Fundrise: public ticker for private tech

KEYWORDS